Monday, April 28, 2025

Good news from Daily KOS

 Oh I know what you are thinking: That Goodie — always pushing it a little too far in terms of optimism!  That title is over the top!

Well guess what my friends!   The title is inspired by a quote from the amazing (and NOT overly optimistic) Jennifer Rubin — journalist extraordinaire! She thinks historians will look back at this past week as a week where we reached a tipping point in defeating trump!!

Sure, there is no way to predict the future.  Sure, we will have bad weeks again.

But something changed. 

And it wasn’t all of a sudden. 

it was something that has been building.

With every protest.

With every lawsuit.

With every phone call to an elected official.

With every person using their voice (even when it is scary).

With each of us.

Things are changing and we can continue to make them change.

Go to protests if you can.  Make phone calls.  Show up for town halls. Use your voice.

One day we are going to look back on this and tell the story of when America finally FINALLY stood up against this and began to win.

And you are a part of that story.  And if you aren’t so far, get your ass in the game!  You want to tell your kids and grandkids that you were a part of this amazing moment.

Yes, they will continue to do bad things, but those bad things are a sign of desperation and weakness, not strength.  And many of those bad things will lead to battles that WE WILL WIN.  

.

"Remember that all through history, there have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they seem invincible. But in the end, they always fall. Always.”
― Mahatma Gandhi,

READ MUCH MORE ...




Sunday, April 27, 2025

ICE TOLD THEY DON'T NEED JUDGE TO SIGN WARRANT

 ICE TOLD THEY DON'T NEED JUDGE TO SIGN WARRANT


ICE Can Now Enter Your Home Without a Warrant to Look for Migrants, DOJ Memo Says

April 25, 2025 12:02 pm

A new memo from the Trump administration reveals something shocking: ICE agents have been told they can enter homes without a warrant to arrest migrants, based on little more than suspicion.

The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

The gang in question is Tren de Aragua, a group the Trump administration recently labeled a foreign terrorist organization. But legal experts say this is no justification for shredding the Constitution.

“The home under all constitutional law is the most sacred place where you have a right to privacy,” said immigration attorney Monique Sherman. “By this standard, spurious allegations of gang affiliation means the government can knock down your door.”

READ MORE:

https://dailyboulder.com/ice-can-now-enter-your-home-without-a-warrant-to-find-migrants-doj-memo-says/ 




Exclusive: DOJ memo offers blueprint to Tren de Aragua deportation plan

Nick PenzenstadlerWill CarlessUSA TODAY


Updated April 25, 2025

Trump administration officials directed law enforcement nationwide to pursue suspected gang members into their homes, in some cases without any sort of warrant, according to a copy of the directive exclusively obtained by USA TODAY.

The directive, issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi March 14, provides the first public view of the specific implementation of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act invoked to deport migrants accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.

A day after that announcement, March 15, immigration officials apprehended and flew more than 200 Venezuelans to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, which has been criticized for its harsh and dangerous conditions.

For weeks, news organizations, members of Congress, the courts and advocates have pressed the administration to provide operational details and evidence to support its claims these men are Tren de Aragua members, a newly designated foreign terrorist organization.

The memo was provided to USA TODAY by the open government group, Property of the People, which they obtained through a records request.

The memo told law enforcement that immigrants deemed "Alien Enemies" are “not entitled to a hearing, appeal or judicial review.”

READ MORE:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/25/trump-venezuelan-gang-deportations-alien-enemies-act/83253074007/

Friday, April 18, 2025

Dunleavy Vetoes Education Bill HB 69

 


Governor vetoes education funding bill, sending HB 69 back to state lawmakers


ALASKA NEWS SOURCE
Published: Apr. 17, 2025 at 10:08 AM AKDT

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) - State lawmakers have a renewed endeavor ahead of them after Gov. Mike Dunleavy, R-Alaska, formally vetoed House Bill 69, which arrived to his desk in a “stripped-down” form but still provided a $1,000 per-student funding increase via the Base Student Allocation for school districts across Alaska.

READ MORE:

https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2025/04/17/governor-vetoes-education-funding-bill-sending-hb-69-back-state-lawmakers/ 



VOTED FOR THE BILL


URGE SUPPORTERS TO OVERRIDE THE VETO!

List of “Yes” voters. Please put pressure on your legislators. Thank them for their initial yes vote of HB69. Tell them to stay steadfast - maintain the course and contribute to overriding Dunleavy’s veto.







.


Thursday, April 17, 2025

Indivisible: "We are in a full-blown constitutional crisis"

 

This email came from Indivisible:


We are in the midst of a full-blown constitutional crisis.

That statement has been true nearly every day since January 20, as the administration has usurped the powers of Congress by illegally freezing funds, declared fake emergencies to grant itself more power, and skirted judicial rulings. 

But Trump’s brazen defiance of a Supreme Court order to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran torture prison is truly a watershed moment for our teetering democracy.


To recap: 

  • The Trump administration has sent over 238 people (likely far more) to a torture prison in El Salvador without due process. Mounting reporting suggests many of these people have no gang affiliation at all, despite the administration’s hollow claims. 
  • One of those people was Kilmar Abrego Garcia -- a man who had been granted protected status, prohibiting his deportation by the federal government. The Trump administration deported (kidnapped) him anyway and blamed it on an administrative error. 
  • On April 10, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Trump administration must facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return. 
  • In the days since, the administration has made it clear it does not intend to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling, ludicrously claiming that it does not have the power to bring him back. 

Abrego Garcia’s legally protected status and the resulting court rulings have made his name a rallying cry. But there are many, many more like him who’ve been snatched up and sent to this foreign prison without due process, and who -- by all accounts -- were ripped away from their families with no real evidence of any wrongdoing. 

And seemingly daily, the administration is grabbing legal permanent residents and visa-holders off the streets, obscuring their whereabouts to impede legal challenges, and deporting them merely for exercising their First Amendment-protected right to dissent. 

To add to the urgency of this moment, Trump told El Salvador’s dictator this week that he should build new prisons, because the administration hopes to deport American citizens next. 

With Trump openly defying a Supreme Court stacked with his own appointees, we’ll level with you: This crisis won’t be resolved through the courts. And it ain’t gonna be solved by adding our name to petitions. The only way forward is massive public pressure. We all have a role to play. 

1️⃣ The first step is simple: Speak out. We need to help our networks understand that this isn’t some abstract threat that has nothing to do with them: If the administration can arrest dissenters, send protected migrants to foreign prisons without due process, and defy the courts, all of our rights are at risk. 

Have these conversations in person. Post articles on social that refuse to soften the edges of this crisis or normalize Trump’s actions. Here’s oneHere’s another. And another.

2️⃣ The second step: Make your elected officials feel the heat. Every elected official took an oath to defend the Constitution. This is their moment to put up or shut up. 

Democrats are in the minority, but not without power. Richard Blumenthal and Brian Schatz are delaying the confirmation of dozens of Trump nominees. Cory Booker used a marathon speech to take control of one of the most important commodities in politics: Public attention. And Chris Van Hollen is currently in El Salvador on a mission to protect his constituent and demand his return.

Republicans are less likely to speak out against the administration, but they will if they’re getting enough blowback on this (the kind of blowback we’re already seeing at town halls). We can’t let them off the hook here because we expect so little of them -- we’ve got to make their phones ring off the hook. 

Whether you’re represented by a Democrat or Republican in Congress, call them NOW and demand they speak out against Trump’s defiance of the Supreme Court, push for an end to these lawless abductions, and move to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia home immediately.

If they’re not answering or their voicemail is full, you can send them an email using this tool (and then call back!). 

3️⃣ Finally: We’re going to need popular resistance. We’ve known all along that stopping Trump’s authoritarian takeover is going to take more than calling our members of Congress. It’s going to take demonstrating to our neighbors, our communities, and to those who may even disagree with us on most things that what Trump is doing is not acceptable. It’s going to take mass popular resistance, bringing people together in community to demand change. It’s going to take getting into the streets to defend our democracy.

You did this on April 5 for the Hands Off! Day of Action. You’re doing this right now with protests and other events during the congressional recess (there’s still time to get plugged in -- see the toolkit here, which now includes resources on Abrego Garcia’s case). And we’re going to do this again together on May 1 for the May Day National Day of Action. Big, public demonstrations of defiance are opportunities for us to lock arms, get loud, and fight back. Make a plan to participate now -- and among the other chants in defense of our democracy, call for bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia home.


We’re continuing to work with partners on tactics that’ll draw attention to the injustice of these kidnappings and disappearances and put pressure on elected officials to do their damn jobs and uphold our Constitution. Expect more from us on this in the coming days, but please do not wait to take action. When far too many are choosing silence, we need everyone in this movement to raise our collective voice now. 

In solidarity, 
Indivisible Team



ADAM SCHIFF

This Is a Constitutional Crisis

https://youtu.be/HGTIELDTHOo?si=U4znJYy0xdIzeItj 



SIGN UP FOR INDIVISIBLE  AT:



.

The No Rogue Rulings Act (H.R. 1526)

 

Letter from the NEA


VOTE NO on bill

to constrain courts

The No Rogue Rulings Act (H.R. 1526) would sharply limit the ability of federal district courts to impose nationwide injunctions.

Submitted on: April 1, 2025



U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative:

On behalf of our 3 million members and the 50 million students they serve, we urge you to VOTE NO on H.R. 1526, the No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA). Votes on this issue may be included in NEA’s report card for the 119th Congress.

NORRA would sharply limit the ability of federal district courts to issue nationwide injunctions that halt, at least temporarily, unlawful and unconstitutional actions taken by the federal government while allowing litigation to proceed. When those actions could hurt people nationwide, courts must issue timely rulings to protect people nationwide. That is their job.

By its nature, NORRA threatens the checks and balances that are the cornerstone of our constitutional system. Limiting the ability of federal courts to identify and pause unconstitutional and unlawful actions with nationwide ramifications threatens our democracy and the rule of law itself.

The larger context in which NORRA is being introduced must be considered as well. In response to decisions with which they disagree, officials at the highest level of the Trump administration have attacked federal judges, railed against their authority, threatened impeachment, and openly defied court orders.

For all these reasons, we urge you to oppose NORRA.

Sincerely,

Marc Egan
Director of Government Relations
National Education Association


https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/action-center/letters-testimony/vote-no-bill-constrain-courts 





Tuesday, April 15, 2025

The Test is Coming

 

Published in
Apr 7, 2025

The National Security Leaders Notebook

Patrick M. (Mike) Condray, Colonel, USAF (Ret)

This test is coming — and soon.

Within weeks — likely just after the April 20, 2025, deadline for a report on the use of the Insurrection Act — our active duty military will face a nearly impossible choice: uphold their oath to support and defend the Constitution or obey the orders of the President of the United States.

The Oath of Enlistment (USAF version):

“I [state your full name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God (optional).”

But what happens when the President of the United States acts — directly or indirectly — to overthrow the Constitution? What does the oath demand then?

One potential safeguard is embedded in military law itself: regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which explicitly prohibit carrying out unlawful orders. “Just following orders” was no defense at the Nuremberg trials — and that precedent matters.

[skipping a bit]

That is precisely why President Trump recently purged the ranks of senior military leadership. He removed the Judge Advocate Generals, the military lawyers whose job it is to advise on the legality of orders. These firings were not incidental; they were intentional, and they were a warning.

[and further down]:

The buffer is gone.

President Trump has directed his new Secretary of Defense to produce a report on whether it is “appropriate” to invoke the Insurrection Act to use the U.S. military against immigrants or demonstrators. That report is due April 20. Does anyone seriously doubt what Pete Hegseth will tell the President?

I fear for our service members. And I weep for what is about to happen to our Republic.

Make no mistake: President Trump will invoke the Insurrection Act. He will attempt to use the United States military against his perceived enemies.

Read it all at:

https://medium.com/the-national-security-leaders-notebook/the-test-is-coming-883493cd3e6b 

RELATED GRAPHIC (not from that article)




.

EO that Would Eliminate 100 Years of Environmental Regulations

A new Trump executive order waiting in the wings. 

Executive order that would eliminate 100 years of environmental regulations 

including the Endangered Spp Act. 

No shit.

Executive Orders
April 9, 2025

ZERO-BASED REGULATORY BUDGETING TO UNLEASH AMERICAN ENERGY

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  In our country, laws are supposed to provide the certainty and order necessary to foster liberty and innovation.  Instead, our vast regulatory structure often serves to constrict ordered liberty, not promote it.  The United States Code itself is more than 60,000 pages.  But unelected agency officials write most of the complex, legally binding rules on top of that, often stretching these statutory provisions beyond what the Congress enacted. 

In particular, the previous administration added more pages to the Federal Register than any other in history, with the result that the Code of Federal Regulations now approaches a staggering 200,000 pages.  These regulations linger in such volume that serious reexamination seldom occurs.
This regime of governance-by-regulator has imposed particularly severe costs on energy production, where innovation is critical.  The net result is an energy landscape perpetually trapped in the 1970s.  By rescinding outdated regulations that serve as a drag on progress, we can stimulate innovation and deliver prosperity to everyday Americans. 

This order directs certain agencies to incorporate a sunset provision into their regulations governing energy production to the extent permitted by law, thus compelling those agencies to reexamine their regulations periodically to ensure that those rules serve the public good. 

Sec2.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:
(a)  “Conditional Sunset Date” means the date a regulation will cease to be effective and be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations, if the agency does not extend the Sunset Date pursuant to section 4(d) of this order.
(b)  “Covered Agency” means one of the agencies listed in section 3(a) of this order.
(c)  “Covered Regulation” means a regulation issued in whole or in part pursuant to a statutory authority listed in sections 3(b)-(j) of this order. 
(d)  “DOGE Team Lead” means the leader of the DOGE Team at each agency as described in Executive Order 14158.
(e)  “Regulation” means each part, subpart, or individual provision of the Code of Federal Regulations promulgated under an agency rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(4).

Sec3.  Covered Agencies and Regulations.  (a)  This order applies to the following agencies and their subcomponents:  the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the Department of Energy (DoE); the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC); and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).  It further applies to the following agency subcomponents:  the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), all within the Department of the Interior; and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACE), within the United States Army.
(b)  For the DoE, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)    the Atomic Energy Act of 1954;
(ii)   the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987;
(iii)  the Energy Policy Act of 1992;
(iv)   the Energy Policy Act of 2005; and
(v)    the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
(c)  For FERC, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)    the Federal Power Act of 1935; 
(ii)   the Natural Gas Act of 1938; and
(iii)  the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978.
(d)  For the NRC, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)    the Atomic Energy Act of 1954;
(ii)   the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974; and
(iii)  the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.
(e)  For the OSMRE, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and any amendments thereto.
(f)  For the BLM, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)    the Mining Act of 1872; 
(ii)   the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976; and 
(iii)  the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
(g)  For the BOEM, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)   the Outer Continental Shelf Act of 1953; and
(ii)  the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
(h)  For the BSEE, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Act of 1953 and any amendments thereto.
(i)  For the FWS, this order applies to all regulations issued pursuant to the following statutes and any amendments thereto:
(i)     the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act;
(ii)    the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918;
(iii)   the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934;
(iv)    the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act of 1965;    
(v)     the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972;
(vi)    the Endangered Species Act of 1973;
(vii)   the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976; and
(viii)  the Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982.
(j)  For the EPA and ACE, within 30 days of the date of this order, the Administrator of the EPA and Secretary of the Army shall provide to the President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Director), a list of statutes vesting EPA and ACE with regulatory authority that shall be subject to this order.   

Sec4.  Zero-Based Regulating.  (a)  To the extent consistent with applicable law, each of the Covered Agencies shall issue a sunset rule, effective not later than September 30, 2025, that inserts a Conditional Sunset Date into each of their Covered Regulations.
(b)  The sunset rule shall provide that each Covered Regulation in effect on the date of this order shall have a Conditional Sunset Date of 1 year after the effective date of the sunset rule, subject to the process set forth in subsection (d) of this section.  Unless the extension condition specified in subsection (d) of this section is satisfied, agencies will treat Covered Regulations as ceasing to be effective on that date for all purposes.  An agency shall not take any action to enforce such an ineffective regulation and, to the maximum extent permitted by law, shall remove it from the Code of Federal Regulations. 
(c)  In any new Covered Regulation, to the maximum extent consistent with law, the relevant Covered Agency shall include a Conditional Sunset Date that is not more than 5 years in the future.  Amendments to any Covered Regulation shall provide that they do not reset that regulation’s Conditional Sunset Date and shall be subject to the same Conditional Sunset Date as the amended regulation.  The OMB Director may exempt a new regulation or amendment from the requirements of this paragraph if he determines that the new regulation or amendment has a net deregulatory effect.
(d)  The sunset provision added to existing and new Covered Regulations shall provide that the agency will offer the public an opportunity to comment on the costs and benefits of each regulation, such as through a request for information, prior to a rule’s expiration, and following such opportunity the Conditional Sunset Date for that Covered Regulation may be extended if the agency finds an extension is warranted.  A request for information shall not automatically extend the Conditional Sunset Date.  A Covered Agency may extend the Conditional Sunset Date for a particular Covered Regulation as many times as is appropriate, but never to a date more than 5 years in the future.

Sec5.  Implementation.  (a)  Neither a determination to extend the Conditional Sunset Date of a particular regulation, nor a regulation that expires as a result this order, shall count towards the ten-for-one regulatory requirement in Executive Order 14192 of January 31, 2025 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation).
(b)  Agency heads shall coordinate with their DOGE Team Leads and the Office of Management and Budget to implement this order.
(c)  This order shall not apply to regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.

Sec6.  Severability.  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any agency, person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other agencies, persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

Sec7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the OMB Director relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/zero-based-regulatory-budgeting-to-unleash-american-energy/

Planning to Deport Citizens?

 

Newer link here:

To NPR article.


'Homegrowns are next': Trump hopes to deport and jail U.S. citizens abroad

April 16, 202511:56 AM ET

Brian Mann

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366178/trump-deport-jail-u-s-citizens-homegrowns-el-salvador



Trump is in the White House with the dictator from El Salvador that runs the CECOT prison and he says the Homegrowns are next. We'll need about 5 more prisons. And everyone laughs.

When I saw this clip posted elsewhere, I wondered if it was made by AI or altered. But now Rachel posted it on her show (and you know how researched she is.

Rachel Maddow show

Rachel Maddow shares video of Donald Trump talking with El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about his intention to deport American citizens to prison in El Salvador. Sherrilyn Ifill, civil rights lawyer and law professor, joins to discuss. 

She then shows a clip of Donald Trump floating the idea of sending Homegrowns "criminals" to El Salvador as well and that Pam Bondi is "studying the laws right now." And he says: if we can do that, that's good.

Rachel Maddow calls this not a constitutional crisis, but a "constitutional end."

And Trump has said that he can't wait to see those who protest at Tesla to to an El Salvadorian prison. Steve Miller is planning to do a "mass denaturalization" of people who are in prison.

WTF?

https://youtu.be/k0PhviW_vek?si=pJa8iHrqZ4hQs_1w 

For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day click here: https://www.msnbc.com/


ALSO THIS:

Trump Official Declaring 'Anyone Who Preaches Hate for America' Will Be Deported Worries Users: 'They Just Skip the First Amendment'
"Democracy doesn't work like that," one user commented.
M.B. Mack / Published Apr 14 2025, 11:44 AM EDT




Top Trump official Stephen Miller's recent declaration that anyone who "preaches hate for America" will face deportation has ignited alarm online, with critics warning the statement disregards First Amendment protections.

The controversy began during a Monday morning appearance from the White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy on Fox News. Miller was defending the deportation of a Salvadoran national alleged to be involved in gang activity, as well as the pending removal of Mahmoud Khalil, a protester accused of supporting Hamas.

While Miller discussed a federal judge's authorization to deport Khalil, and the online debate that followed quickly turned toward broader implications for dissent and political expression.


In response to questioning by Fox anchor Bill Hemmer, Miller asserted that Khalil would be and went on to claim that everyone else who preached hate towards the country would also be at risk.

"Yes he will, as will anyone who preaches hate for America," Miller said. "Under this country, under this administration, under President Trump, people who hate America, who threaten our citizens, who rape, who murder, and who support those who rape and murder are going to be ejected from this country."

https://www.latintimes.com/trump-official-declaring-anyone-who-preaches-hate-america-will-deported-worries-users-they-580663 


ALSO STEPHEN MILLER 

HEMMER: Will Mahmoud Khalil be deported? STEPHEN MILLER: Yes he will, as will anyone who preaches hate for America.

Miller goes on to say that others who "rape and murder" and those who support them are going to be "ejected" from this country.

He goes on to tell outrageous lies saying people should cry over the blood of people that was shed or the "half a million children that Biden trafficked into this country .... Cemeteries are filled with tombstones from Americans that were killed by Joe Biden.... ."

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1911775024979058720


MSNBC ABOUT MASS DEPORTATIONS:

They are labeling people as "dead" and cancelling their social security numbers so that they can't stay in the U.S. and work:

As my MSNBC colleague Ja’han Jones explained, this reached a new level last week when Team Trump began cancelling immigrants’ lawfully obtained Social Security numbers — essentially listing individuals as dead — “as a means to impede their ability to make money or access government services and to pressure them to leave the country.”

The Washington Post reported that administration officials confronted objections from the Social Security Administration but ignored them while adding “thousands of immigrants ranging in age from teenagers to octogenarians to the agency’s Death Master File.” From the report:

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/white-houses-deportation-agenda-reaches-new-levels-radicalism-rcna201178 

LISA MURKOWSKI

WE ARE ALL SCARED.

When someone asked what she'd tell people who are scared right now, she said. "We are all scared."

She admitted this to a non-profit group she recently visited. Having her admit this is almost as scary as other things I've recently heard. 

https://www.adn.com/politics/2025/04/14/we-are-all-afraid-speaking-to-alaska-nonprofit-leaders-murkowski-gets-candid-on-upheaval-in-federal- 




,

Thank you to those who attended No Kings II rally, and how to keep in the loop

  Greetings! Thank you for all coming out to the No Kings II rally on Saturday, Oct 18th. When we stand up against the things that are curre...